Letters | Jun 01, 2019
Letters

Karl Poruben

While reading the March magazine, I noticed that the Collegiates will no longer include classic accuracy. It’s a passing. It made me recall when, a few years ago, the U.S. Army Parachute Team leadership got out of classic. I also remembered when those APT guys set all kinds of accuracy records. At least classic is still pretty strong in Europe.

Then, I read “Profile,” and the lady’s answer to the “Would you rather swoop or land on an accuracy tuffet?” question [was “Accuracy tuffets should be taken away so people can’t stall their parachutes in and call it a ‘landing,’ or else up the ante by surrounding it with razor wire.”] I do not know whether her answer was humorous or way above my head. Our sport has evolved quite a bit since I started. I know what it was like, when accuracy ruled the day, to make a downwind approach on a 1.1 or PC into a pea pit and feel a great sense of accomplishment with your score. I also believe tuffets have increased the lifespan of many an accuracy jumper. Accuracy kept those jumpers in the sport, because it’s the venue they like. Just my thought. 

Karl Poruben | D-2919
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Skydive Store

Rate this article:
No rating
Print

Number of views (3488)/Comments (0)

Tags: June 2019

Leave a comment

This form collects your name, email, IP address and content so that we can keep track of the comments placed on the website. For more info check our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use where you will get more info on where, how and why we store your data.
Add comment